Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
Biomedical Innovation with Colin Stewart ~ Biomedical news and comment from Orange County, Calif., and beyond

Botox rival Reloxin could go on sale in U.S. next year (update)

March 17th, 2008, 8:59 am · 1 Comment · posted by Colin Stewart

Medicis logoWould-be Botox challenger Reloxin is back in the race and could reach the U.S. marketplace next year.

Its corporate sponsors, Medicis Pharmaceutical of Scottsdale, Ariz., and Ipsen of Paris, announced today that they have refiled their application for Food and Drug Administration approval to market the wrinkle-fighting injectible drug in the United States.

Medicis said it is hoping for FDA action on the application by early 2009.

Ipsen makes the drug, a dilute form of botulinum toxin similar to Botox, and sells it in about 20 countries under the name Dysport. If the two companies win FDA clearance, Medicis would market it in the United States under the name Reloxin.

Newport Beach dermatologist Dr. Dore Gilbert predicts that Reloxin will face difficulties when it goes up against  Botox.

“Will people trust a new toxin?  I believe my patients will want the original,” he said.

Medicis had filed a Reloxin application in late 2007, but the FDA rejected it, saying that the application didn’t spell out Medicis’ role in relation to manufacturing the product. Medicis and Ipsen said the new application by the two companies is basically the same as the first one, except for changes related to “sponsorship and ownership of the filing.”

In March 2006, Ipsen granted Medicis rights to cosmetic uses of the drug in the United States, Canada and Japan. Under the terms of its deal with Ipsen, Medicis said it will pay Ipsen about $25 million once the FDA accepts the Reloxin application.

Botox, made by Irvine-based Allergan, is the No. 1 cosmetic medical treatment in the United States, with more than 3 million injections in 2006, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Medicis estimated that the U.S. market for cosmetic botulinum toxin injections totals $300 million to $400 million.

(This post was updated at 1:15 p.m. March 17 to include Dr. Dore Gilbert’s comment.)

Reader comments: We want this to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We expect people to differ -- judgment and opinion are subjective -- and we encourage free speech and the exchange of ideas. But you are participating in a community that is intended for all of our users and we prohibit profanity, vulgarity, racial, sexual and homophobic remarks, threats, harassment and personal attacks. Here's the full User Agreement. Thank you for making this a safe place worth preserving and sharing. Share this: The icons below make it easy to share this post with others. First icon e-mails a link.
  • email
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in: Uncategorized •
 
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Comments
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement.
  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic.
  2. No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

 One Comment

  • I suspect that Botox will rapidly lose ground if Reloxin is effective and safe. Cost becomes the issue with two similar products. I could double my botox practice if it cost less.

Leave a Reply